Adequacy front page
Stories Diaries Polls Users

Home About Topics Rejects Abortions
This is an archive site only. It is no longer maintained. You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email will not be read. Please read this page if you have questions.
 The AIDS Hoax

 Author:  Topic:  Posted:
Jul 19, 2001

Reading jsm's "Gay Tax" story, I was shocked to discover an apparently serious suggestion that money be donated to AIDS research. I was sure that the readers of this site would be aware of the well-known fact that the AIDS "disease" is a hoax. Evidently, some of you aren't. Therefore, for your edification, I present a detailed analysis of the hoax that is AIDS, the groups and motives behind it, and what we can do about it.


More stories about Conspiracy
The Gay Tax
Models - Stormtrooping superbitches of the Fashion Industry
Luv Yr Enemies -- Jesus Christ
Germany Eats Young in Attempt to Globalize
Saluting American Heroes on Flight 93
Once again, blame Microsoft!
Crazy, Like Me
The Guide to Airplane Hijacking in the Post-WTC Era
The Evil of M*A*S*H
Hijacked plane crash destroys Canary Wharf; Shocked Americans ask, `What's Canary Wharf?'
The Hidden Threat
Was the fourth plane shot down during an attack on 9/11?
Looking For A Few Good Crusaders
The Boy Scouts of America, and the Threat To American Values

More stories by
Steve Richards

Capital Punishment Should Serve the People
Bedtime for Democracy: Human Rights and other Bad Ideas

Most leading scientists agree that there is virtually no proof that AIDS is a transmitted disease of any sort, much less that there is an "HIV" virus that causes it - in fact, this so-called "HIV" virus itself has never been isolated. Not once! Furthermore, "HIV" tests are notoriously unreliable, and many (or all) AIDS diagnoses are actually mistaken diagnoses of other, well-established diseases. The degree of credibility given to this shoddy "evidence", as well as the sheer amount of money spent on combating an AIDS "epidemic" spread by the "HIV virus" clearly indicate the presence of another force in play here, one that stands to gain from such a situation.

This force is, of course, the gay community. The AIDS hoax has been perpetrated in order to levy a sort of "gay tax": all public and private funding for AIDS research over the past ten years has gone straight to the coffers of the gay community, where it has then been used to perpetuate the AIDS hoax, to sap and weaken our childrens' moral fiber with massive hedonistic insults to public morality, and, as jsm puts it, to buy Hello Kitty oven gloves (among other things).

Countering this, the real "gay tax," is no easy task. The gay community is large and powerful, and loath to give up its ill-gotten gains. I therefore suggest that we learn from the examples of the three nations most successful in combating this threat, the three nations where this AIDS foolishness never managed to gain a foothold: China, Cuba, and North Korea. These are the three last truly socialist nations left in the world, and all three have a negligible per-capita incidence of AIDS - a correlation clearly beyond mere coincidence, and with socialism's myriad benefits, it's hard not to see why this is so. Socialist states have the advantages of medical establishments untainted by corporate greed, harsh punishments for traitors to the revolutionary people, and strong, upstanding leaders who can provide clear guidance to the masses in time of need.

Therefore, it is clear that socialism is obviously the only reasonable response to this gay capitalist conspiracy. Our gay opressors know this, and it is only because of our unorganized and uninformed state that they dare to bully us. Make no mistake, we can win - but our war is a war of the masses; it can be waged only by mobilizing the masses and relying on them.

So what are we waiting for?


Could it be more a matter of self control (1.00 / 1) (#1)
by Adam Rightmann on Thu Jul 19th, 2001 at 06:39:27 AM PST
In the three Communist states you mention, China, Cuba, and north Korea, the deluded populace have had self control ingrained in them, they do not practice casual sex, and they do not practice the dangerous English Style Love. As a result, the few rare cases of AIDS infected people (generally students studying abroad) have little chance to infect others before they start showing the symptons of their disease and become shunned.

Of course, Communism is heinous, but perhaps we could study a faith based program in America to teach people self control to avoid these sexual urges and perverse practices.

A. Rightmann

Self control? (none / 0) (#5)
by Anonymous Reader on Thu Jul 19th, 2001 at 12:14:47 PM PST
"According to AIDS experts of Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, the cases will reach one million in the first few years of next century and ten million people by the end of 2010."

Well gosh, if we sent everyone with AIDS to an "AIDS colony", that would greatly reduce the spread of the disease.

As to N Korea, did you also know they are country with no serious crime, no poverty, no AIDS, no prostitutes, no homosexuals and no women who smoke? Why, isn't that amazing? Sheesh.

Jackass (none / 0) (#10)
by Anonymous Reader on Thu Jul 19th, 2001 at 08:03:38 PM PST
The North Koreans are also starving

English style? (none / 0) (#9)
by Anonymous Reader on Thu Jul 19th, 2001 at 06:54:26 PM PST
<I>they do not practice the dangerous English Style Love. </I>
Funny, I thought English style was S&M, probably the least likely form of sex to spread AIDS. You're thinking of Greek.

Incorrect!! (none / 0) (#3)
by ucblockhead on Thu Jul 19th, 2001 at 07:41:14 AM PST
I'm sorry, but your story is in error. Everyone knows that Mao was gay.

hold your horses... (none / 0) (#4)
by motherfuckin spork on Thu Jul 19th, 2001 at 10:35:26 AM PST
HIV has been identified. It is real. AIDS is another concern. HIV does not necessarily cause AIDS, and there are AIDS cases where the person does not have HIV.

Also, please refer to the fact that AIDS does not kill. Other diseases that your body cannot fight due to AIDS is what kills.

Clearly, the only way to handle your so-called "gay tax" is to begin genocide of all homosexuals, heroin-addicted needle sharers, and anyone else who shares non-saliva bodily fluids.

I am not who you think I am.

"causes" in science is never better than (2.50 / 2) (#7)
by Anonymous Reader on Thu Jul 19th, 2001 at 02:16:06 PM PST

HIV does not necessarily cause AIDS

Well, science concerns itself with correlations. HIV fulfills Koch's postulates as the cause of AIDS.
  1. Empidemiological association -- virtually all AIDS patients are HIV-seropositive.
  2. Isolation -- HIV has been isolated in virtually all AIDS patients using culture and molecular techniques .
  3. Transmission pathogenesis -- Three laboratory technicians have developped aids through accidental exposure to concentrated, cloned HIV in the laboratory. Additionally, the CDC has documented 56 occupationally acquired HIV infections, of which 25 have developped into AIDS in the absence of other risk factors.

Thank you for clearing the air (5.00 / 2) (#6)
by SpaceGhoti on Thu Jul 19th, 2001 at 01:15:31 PM PST
I'm sure my friend will be greatly relieved to discover he didn't die of complications due to AIDS after all.

A troll's true colors.

Whatever (none / 0) (#8)
by sventhatcher on Thu Jul 19th, 2001 at 03:46:18 PM PST
While I don't have the scientific evidince to refute the idea that perhaps HIV is not the cause of AIDS (which has actually been discussed by those with scientific knowledge in your defense and thus isn't completely crackpot), but there is no homosexual conspiracy.

It just doesn't make logical sense. Homosexual males are by far the largest demographic currently infected with the virus. The *deadly* virus.

It makes no sense. If such a conspiracy did exist, and they wanted to kill off some of their own for show then they would make it a relatively small amount not the majority.

--Sven (now with bonus weblog vanity site! (MLP sold seperately))

If AIDS is a gay conspiracy... (5.00 / 1) (#11)
by geekchic on Thu Jul 19th, 2001 at 09:08:48 PM PST
...then why do so many straight people die from its complications?

i better tell my family (none / 0) (#12)
by tiana on Fri Jul 20th, 2001 at 03:10:38 AM PST
im sure my uncle will just be overjoyed to hear that my aunt didnt die of aids from a blood transfusion. i better email him with the lovely news.

who profits? (none / 0) (#13)
by Darkangelfire on Mon Jul 23rd, 2001 at 11:32:05 AM PST
I am not disagreeing with you that AIDS may not really exist to the extent it is publisized, however I have to disagree that it does not exist. I lived in a small town of 45,000 people back in the late 80's and early 90's. During those few years I had made friends with a large portion of the gay community there, and during that time period the amount of them keeling over dead from what was called AIDS, was unbelievable. So, if not AIDS, is there some other disease we don't know about killing off mainly gay people? Secondly, the gay community is not as organized as you profess, and really who is profitting here is the medical community, not the gays.


All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ® 2001, 2002, 2003 The name, logo, symbol, and taglines "News for Grown-Ups", "Most Controversial Site on the Internet", "Linux Zealot", and "He just loves Open Source Software", and the RGB color value: D7D7D7 are trademarks of No part of this site may be republished or reproduced in whatever form without prior written permission by and, if and when applicable, prior written permission by the contributing author(s), artist(s), or user(s). Any inquiries are directed to